Research Methodology

Research standard

How we research and verify guidance

Our research process identifies the exact question, checks the responsible official sources, separates regional differences and records meaningful review information.

Last updated: 11 July 2026
Preferred evidenceCurrent official source
Regional differencesKept separate
Personal decisionsNot provided

1. Define the exact question

We first identify the country, Region, type of work, expected duration, person involved and process stage. This prevents an answer about one route or authority from being applied to another.

2. Identify the responsible public body

We determine which authority or official service is responsible for the specific statement. A submission portal, regional work authority, federal residence authority, municipality and diplomatic post can each cover a different part of the process.

3. Check current official sources

We prefer current official pages for the exact jurisdiction and stage. When useful, we also check the applicable official publication or legal text, but we do not replace practical authority instructions with a private summary.

4. Separate regional and procedural differences

Belgian instructions can differ by Region, administrative stage and type of application. We do not copy one Region’s wording into another Region or treat a portal action as proof of approval.

5. Investigate conflicting wording

When official pages appear to disagree, we compare their date, jurisdiction, process stage and responsibility. If the difference cannot be resolved confidently, the uncertainty is stated and the reader is directed to the responsible authority.

6. Write the direct answer and its limits

The page explains the relevant distinction first, then adds conditions, exceptions and next steps. It also states what cannot be decided without individual facts or current official confirmation.

7. Review links, dates and wording

Before publication, we check that official links open correctly, date labels have a real meaning, important terms are explained and the page does not promise an outcome or present general information as a personalised decision.

8. Recheck information according to change risk

Procedural pages are reviewed more often than stable background pages. A material source, process or authority change can trigger an earlier review.

Important limit

A completed review reduces the risk of outdated or misrouted information. It cannot guarantee that an authority instruction, legal rule, form or portal did not change afterward.